tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post8611073142442799240..comments2012-01-31T22:32:38.064ZRedHeadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15697263069260335700noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-45134676921251474222012-01-31T22:32:38.064Z2012-01-31T22:32:38.064ZAhaha! I completely misunderstood your post about Avatar...as you noticed. I think that some members of the Academy (Spielberg, the Weinstein brothers, Cruise, etc) missed voting/were playing golf that year, that's why the fluke-y wins. Were there ANY films/actors nominated this year that weren't from Spielberg/Weinstein/establishement films??!!HelsBellshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02795513524075915891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-7412220660251691172012-01-30T17:14:16.762Z2012-01-30T17:14:16.762ZAnd thanks for your comments and reads, everyone!RedHeadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15697263069260335700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-14134027845243285412012-01-30T17:14:00.792Z2012-01-30T17:14:00.792ZNo, Hell, I agree on Avatar. What I mean is that it's strange that an Academy that gave credit to a lower budget film with a great plot over a bloated box office juggernaut one year has now done completely the reverse.RedHeadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15697263069260335700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-78809755542671484342012-01-27T23:42:03.543Z2012-01-27T23:42:03.543ZI disagree with you on Avatar. I though it lacked depth. Yes, the FX were amazing but everything else left so much to be desired in terms of Best Picture. I did not think it even deserved to be nominated. Granted, I'm not sure if Hurt Locker deserved the Oscar but I will admit that I was relieved it was not Avatar. But I never thought that Titanic deserved the Oscar, nor Gladiator...nor so many others...Must stop now before I become ticked off. ;-)HelsBellshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02795513524075915891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-7712307357154659252012-01-27T00:21:22.547Z2012-01-27T00:21:22.547ZUgh I agree! I hated tin tin!!Steffenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08897715718401049780noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-15414292274572895432012-01-27T00:16:13.031Z2012-01-27T00:16:13.031ZThis post is so funny, man I never watch shows like that! Proably for that reasonCollette Haganhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10189931009207590432noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-65347457991264576322012-01-25T15:39:09.725Z2012-01-25T15:39:09.725ZThe fact that this is the same Academy that gave The Hurt Locker an Oscar over Avatar just confuses me. What the heck happened? I'm going to do a follow-up post on why Shame got excluded, as I'm yet to write about my feelings on Shame and thought it should be left until people had had a chance to see it!RedHeadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15697263069260335700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6121135910110645409.post-82475916591997306232012-01-24T20:55:33.933Z2012-01-24T20:55:33.933ZYeah...Jonah Hill? Seriously??? Disgusting. Fassbender deserves that nomination for "Shame". It was the best performance of the year, period. Not Pitt. And "Tin Tin" not in the best animated feature? BS! I'm in complete agreement with you. The last time I was this disgusted was when "Gladiator" won.HelsBellshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02795513524075915891noreply@blogger.com